
The always excellent Kevin Kernan has a nice piece on Jeff Franceur's optimism going forward for 2010.
Francoeur has been something of a tough case for Mets fans, especially those of us who like more advanced stats.
The good: Francoeur was a very welcome shot in the arm when he came over late last year...he's like a permanent 5-hour energy drink. He also has the ability to relax those around him, plays decent (albeit overrated) defense, and he certainly has life in the bat. Lastly, he is extremely durable, can go out there every day and hits lefty's like an all-star.
The bad: It all centers around his inability to get on base. Francoeur has a lifetime .311 OBP in almost 3,000 big league plate appearances.
So why should we be as optimistic as Francoeur?
First off, he has steadily cut down on his Ks.
In the past 4 seasons his K numbers have showed a steady decline: 132, 129, 111, 92
His SO% has decreased in each of his 5 big league campaigns: 21,2%, 19.2%, 18.5%, 17.0%, 14.6%
What hasn't changed, however, are the key stats that lead to a decent on-base percentage.
His pitches per plate appearance have remained steady at around 3.4 per plate appearance. It's pretty tough to take walks with those numbers, but more importantly, Francoeur doesn't allow himself enough patience to wait on the most hittable pitch in an at-bat.
So the optimism must remain "cautious" at this point. Francoeur did make better contact with the Mets than he had in previous Brave campaigns. His batting average and slugging jumped by leaps and bounds, and he certainly looked aggressive and confident at the plate.
If Howard Johnson's work, and Francoer's maturity, can harness the talent into a 25 HR, 90 RBI, .330 OBP type of player, than it is a win all around.
Francoeur is never going to get on base a ton--this we know--what we want is for him to get on base "enough" while providing a solid presence in the lower half of the lineup.
I am optimistic about that.
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Jeff Francoeur is Optimistic...I Agree (a little)
by Dave Singer
by
Dave Singer
at
7:32 AM
1 comments
Labels: Batting average, Howard Johnson, Jeff Francoeur, Mets, New York Mets, On-base percentage, Plate appearance, Slugging percentage
Thursday, January 28, 2010
A Tatis/Murphy Platoon Makes Sense
by Dave Singer
The more I think about Tatis coming back, the more inclined I am to like the idea based on the statistical evidence before us.
First off, Tatis, who had a dreadful first 2/3rds of a season in 2009, hit very well in August and September.
In August he hit .310 with an .811 OPS, and in September he hit .353 with an .883 OPS (he was 4 for 8 in October as well).
His overall splits were:
| 2009 Batting Splits | ||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| Total | 340 | 42 | 96 | 21 | 4 | 8 | 48 | 22 | 9 | 54 | 4 | 1 | .282 | .339 | .438 | .777 | ||
| By Breakdown | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| vs. Left | 133 | 16 | 37 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 1 | .278 | .364 | .459 | .823 | ||
| vs. Right | 207 | 26 | 59 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 7 | 5 | 29 | 4 | 0 | .285 | .321 | .425 | .746 | ||
| Home | 172 | 23 | 48 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 27 | 14 | 6 | 27 | 2 | 1 | .279 | .352 | .436 | .788 | ||
| Away | 168 | 19 | 48 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 21 | 8 | 3 | 27 | 2 | 0 | .286 | .324 | .440 | .764 | ||
| Day | 107 | 23 | 37 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 7 | 4 | 18 | 4 | 0 | .346 | .397 | .533 | .930 | ||
| Night | 233 | 19 | 59 | 16 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 15 | 5 | 36 | 0 | 1 | .253 | .311 | .395 | .706 | ||
| Grass | 340 | 42 | 96 | 21 | 4 | 8 | 48 | 22 | 9 | 54 | 4 | 1 | .282 | .339 | .438 | .777 | ||
| By Day/Month | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| Last 7 Days | 11 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .545 | .500 | .727 | 1.227 | ||
| April | 23 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | .348 | .407 | .609 | 1.016 | ||
| May | 66 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | .227 | .288 | .318 | .606 | ||
| June | 60 | 5 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | .233 | .313 | .317 | .630 | ||
| July | 48 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 0 | .229 | .288 | .563 | .851 | ||
| August | 84 | 8 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0 | .310 | .359 | .452 | .811 | ||
| September | 51 | 6 | 18 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | .353 | .393 | .490 | .883 | ||
| October | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .500 | .500 | .625 | 1.125 | ||
| Pre All-Star | 173 | 24 | 43 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 3 | 1 | .249 | .320 | .393 | .713 | ||
| Post All-Star | 167 | 18 | 53 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 11 | 1 | 39 | 1 | 0 | .317 | .359 | .485 | .844 | ||
If you look at his numbers vs lefty's, the picture becomes even clearer: a decent .278 BA, .364 OBP, and .823 OPS, and that includes the numbers from his putrid May, June and July.
Similarly, Daniel Murphy had a horrendous May, June and July, and it seemed to click for him a little bit in August and September, especially in the power department.
Murph had a very respectable .556 Slg % in September, though he hardly walked at all during the entire season.
| 2009 Batting Splits | ||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| Total | 508 | 60 | 135 | 38 | 4 | 12 | 63 | 38 | 0 | 69 | 4 | 2 | .266 | .313 | .427 | .740 | ||
| By Breakdown | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| vs. Left | 94 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 19 | 1 | 0 | .223 | .267 | .415 | .682 | ||
| vs. Right | 414 | 50 | 114 | 32 | 4 | 8 | 49 | 32 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 2 | .275 | .324 | .430 | .754 | ||
| Home | 248 | 30 | 73 | 22 | 4 | 7 | 33 | 12 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 0 | .294 | .323 | .500 | .823 | ||
| Away | 260 | 30 | 62 | 16 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 26 | 0 | 39 | 2 | 2 | .238 | .304 | .358 | .662 | ||
| Day | 180 | 21 | 47 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 29 | 16 | 0 | 23 | 3 | 1 | .261 | .318 | .417 | .735 | ||
| Night | 328 | 39 | 88 | 26 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 22 | 0 | 46 | 1 | 1 | .268 | .311 | .433 | .744 | ||
| Grass | 508 | 60 | 135 | 38 | 4 | 12 | 63 | 38 | 0 | 69 | 4 | 2 | .266 | .313 | .427 | .740 | ||
| By Day/Month | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ||
| Last 7 Days | 15 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .333 | .333 | .600 | .933 | ||
| April | 68 | 13 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | .324 | .373 | .426 | .799 | ||
| May | 68 | 8 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 1 | .176 | .278 | .353 | .631 | ||
| June | 75 | 7 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | .240 | .298 | .320 | .618 | ||
| July | 84 | 9 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 17 | 1 | 0 | .250 | .323 | .393 | .716 | ||
| August | 113 | 9 | 33 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 1 | .292 | .308 | .434 | .742 | ||
| September | 90 | 13 | 25 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | .278 | .298 | .556 | .854 | ||
| October | 10 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | .400 | .400 | .800 | 1.200 | ||
| Pre All-Star | 242 | 30 | 60 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 25 | 0 | 30 | 1 | 1 | .248 | .314 | .364 | .678 | ||
| Post All-Star | 266 | 30 | 75 | 27 | 3 | 7 | 35 | 13 | 0 | 39 | 3 | 1 | .282 | .313 | .485 | .798 | ||
You'll notice that his numbers against RH pitching are much better than his numbers vs LH'ers. Moreover, his 20 doubles in 203 August/September at bats is simply outstanding.
If we combine Tatis against LH and Murph against RH using their 2009 splits we can forecast a worse case "player" with about a .280 BA, .350 OBP, and .450 Slg % and 15 HRs and 80 RBIs.
While those numbers are still very average compared to most first basemen in the league, they are not terrible.
I think the two players will actually outperform their 2009 seasons based on the end of season trends, and they can very easily attain a combined 20 HR and 90 RBI season and get on base enough times with gap power to make a decent contribution.
That is good enough.
by
Dave Singer
at
8:00 AM
0
comments
Labels: Daniel Murphy, fernando tatis, On-base percentage, Run batted in, Slugging percentage
Sunday, May 18, 2008
Stat of the Day: David Wright's Righty Struggles
by Dave SingerDW is really scuffling against righthander's this year:
| Split | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | HBP | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| vs. Left | 43 | 7 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | .465 | .549 | .814 | 1.363 |
| vs. Right | 111 | 15 | 23 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 23 | 21 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 2 | .207 | .331 | .423 | .754 |
It's something to keep an eye on as the season continues, especially since he bat .311 against righty's last year and .361 against lefty's.
For his complete splits click here.
by
Dave Singer
at
9:43 AM
0
comments
Labels: Baseball, David Wright Statistics, Johan Santana, Major League, Mets, New York Mets, New York Yankees, On-base percentage, On-base plus slugging, Run batted in, Slugging percentage, Sports, Teams
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Carlos Gomez: Troubling Early Signs
by Dave SingerAs I followed Carlos' assent through the Mets minors and up to the big club last year, I was always troubled by his free swinging style and lack of any sense of the strike zone. A talented athlete, he has all of the physical tools to excel at the major league level, but he is missing one key ingredient--the ability to identify a strike and swing at the pitch that will bring him the highest chance of success.
He has been pretty up and down with the Twins this year, and the latest trends on him are not favorable.
Here are his numbers and projections thus far in 2008:
| 2008 Season Stats | ||||||||||||||||
| SPLITS | G | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | BB | SO | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS |
| Season | 22 | 94 | 12 | 24 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 1 | .255 | .271 | .362 | .633 |
| Career | 79 | 216 | 24 | 51 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 10 | 51 | 21 | 4 | .236 | .276 | .324 | .600 |
| Last 7 | 5 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | .136 | .136 | .273 | .409 |
| Projected | 161 | 688 | 88 | 176 | 37 | 7 | 7 | 44 | 15 | 176 | 73 | 7 | .255 | .271 | .362 | .633 |
Of note is his K to BB ration: 12 to 1. As you can see at the bottom of the chart, he is "on pace" for 175 strikeouts against 15 walks.
The positives are the speed numbers--10 stolen bases with only 1 caught stealing, 12 runs scored despite only being on base 26 times, etc.
So we'll play a bit of a wait and see game with young Carlos--he's an easy guy to root for, and his measurable statistics will get better. Will he ever achieve all-star status? That's a big question mark, and it all depends on his ability to learn the strike zone and become a better pitch selector.
by
Dave Singer
at
9:45 AM
0
comments
Labels: Baseball statistics, List of baseball jargon, New York Mets, On-base percentage, Slugging percentage, Society and Culture, Sports, United Kingdom
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3b9bb02e-e045-4231-8ce6-0787011c3783)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=cf3538ca-0227-4866-bb44-60a1b91dbb6e)







